Raj Koothrappali: “Don’t feel bad Leonard, negative results are still results”

Negative results need airing too : Nature : Nature Publishing Group

As a follow-up to a very interesting publication about extra-sensory perception, a commentary from two member of the NIH on the publication of negative results, published in Nature Correspondence. The basis of the argument is that amongst 20 studies, at least one will hit the magical p<0.05, so there is a need for an avenue for the publication of negative evidence.

I’m not sure that this argument is valid, and I’m not sure that ALL negative experiments need to be published either. In fact, some of the most remarkable research that has been published has been negative evidence that falsifies existing theory – and these certainly didn’t need special avenues for publication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s