Professor Adam G. Dunn

Professor of Biomedical Informatics
The University of Sydney

French guidelines are withdrawn after court finds potential bias among authors

[Lenzer 342 — bmj.com] Formindep “promotes independent medical education and information” found that the working groups involved with the guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease had major financial conflicts of interest and some members failed to disclose their financial interests.

It’s fine to demand disclosure of financial interests, but what would they do with the guidelines if they were disclosed? Leave them in the public domain? And what happens if/when the clinical trials underpinning the guidelines were mostly (or wholly) funded by the pharmaceutical industry that seeks to profit from the over-use of prescription drugs?

French guidelines are withdrawn after court finds potential bias among authors

  • On the value of deplatforming, and seeing online misinformation as an opportunity to counter misinformed beliefs in front of a key audience
  • Do Twitter bots spread vaccine misinformation?
  • trial2rev: seeing the forest for the trees in the systematic review ecosystem
  • How articles from financially conflicted authors are amplified, why it matters, and how to fix it.
  • Thinking outside the cylinder: on the use of clinical trial registries in evidence synthesis communities
  • Differences in exposure to negative news media are associated with lower levels of HPV vaccine coverage